I just
received news that my first book—Employment with a Human Face: Balancing Efficiency, Equity, and Voice—will be
translated and published in Turkish. I have Dr. Fuat Man, a professor of HRM at
Sakarya University to thank for this, and I’m particularly grateful and honored
because he has already translated my The Thought of Work (Çalışma Düşüncesi).
For personal reasons, I often think about Employment
with a Human Face around the holidays (I’ll return to this below), and this
news about a Turkish language edition has magnified these reflections.
I
can’t believe that it’s been 14 years since Employment
with a Human Face was published. It’s now a full-fledged teenager! How is
it holding up? Here are the first two paragraphs of the book:
Employment
is a critical feature of modern society. The nature of employment determines
the quality of individuals’ lives, the operation of the economy, the viability
of democracy, and the degree of respect for human dignity. It is therefore
essential that modern society establish societal goals for employment. Economic
prosperity demands that employment be productive, but should economic
performance be the sole standard of the employment relationship? No. Work is
not simply an economic transaction; respect for the importance of human life
and dignity requires that the fair treatment of workers also be a fundamental
standard of the employment relationship—as are the democratic ideals of freedom
and equality. Furthermore, the importance of self-determination for both human
dignity and democracy mandate employee input and participation in work-related
decisions that affect workers’ lives. In short, the objectives of the employment
relationship are efficiency, equity, and voice. This book is about these
objectives, and the alternative ways in which they can be achieved.
In
some situations, efficiency, equity, and voice are mutually reinforcing. A
productive workforce provides the economic resources for equitable working
conditions that include employee voice in decision making. And equitable
treatment and employee participation can provide the avenues for reducing
turnover, increasing employee commitment, and harnessing workers’ ideas for
improving productivity and quality. But the more important question is: What
should happen when efficiency, equity, and voice conflict with each other? This
is the critical question that makes the analysis of the employment relationship
a dynamic topic with diverse perspectives. Should efficiency—and the closely
related property rights of employers—automatically trump equity and voice
concerns? Or should the reverse be true—should equity and voice have priority
over efficiency needs? Neither of these extreme options is preferable; rather,
a democratic society should seek to balance
efficiency, equity, and voice. The power of free economic markets to provide
efficiency and economic prosperity is important and should be encouraged, but
respect for human dignity and democratic ideals further require that the power
of economic markets be harnessed to serve the quality of human life and provide
broadly shared prosperity. As such, the imperative for the drivers of
employment—individuals, markets, institutions, organizational strategies, and
public policies—is to provide employment with a human face—which I define as a
productive and efficient employment relationship that also fulfills the
standards of human rights. The International Labour Organization (1999) calls
this simply “decent work.”
Maybe
I’m biased, but I think this is as true as ever. Indeed, in recent years there
has been an increased recognition of the deep importance of work, which
magnifies the need to think seriously about the goals of the employment
relationship, imbalances in this relationship, and to reject pure commodification and efficiency approaches. And
there remains a pressing need to strive for a better balance in the workplace
and in our societies. In fact, I just received a press release from the World Inequality Lab that confirms the tremendous increase in inequality that has
occurred over the last few decades around the world, and calls for “more
ambitious policies to democratize access to education and well-paying jobs in
rich and emerging countries alike.” In other words, we need to actively strive
for a better balance between efficiency, equity, and voice in and out of the
workplace, even though this can be difficult, it requires institutional innovation, and there are diverse perspectives on how to best achieve this.
Since
the time I wrote Employment with a Human Face, there has been increased
thinking around citizenship rights as an alternative to human rights. Although
the differences can be subtle, citizenship rights stem from membership in a
human community such as a nation, rather than from being part of overall
humanity, and thereby more clearly place obligations on the nation to provide
citizenship rights. Moreover, whereas human rights are seen as universal, citizens
have obligations as well as rights; so characterizing workers’ rights as
citizenship rights rather than human rights also makes it easier to allow for
workers’ interests such as equity and voice to be balanced with other
objectives such as efficiency. The teenage Employment with a Human Face could
be slightly more nuanced that the original by connecting equity and voice to
citizenship rights rather than focusing on a human rights narrative.
But in
either case, I think the imperative is clear. I started with the introduction,
and I can close with the book’s concluding passage, to which the teenage Employment with a Human Face would also add pressures from financialization as further impetus for new thinking and new policies:
Public
discourse that emphasizes competitive markets, efficiency, and marginal
productivity justice; the frequent lack of appreciation for employee voice; the
continued turbulence of the 21st century workplace; the focus of employment
research on the operation of the existing processes (often solely with
efficiency in mind); and the need for “explicitly recognizing the role of moral
choices in the labor market” (Osterman et al., 2001, 12) all make it imperative
to ground the study of employment in the objectives of the employment
relationship—efficiency, equity, and voice. This grounding provides the basis
for a fuller understanding of all aspects of the employment relationship,
including the alternative behaviors, strategies, institutions, and public policies
for balancing efficiency, equity, and voice. From such analyses can come
workplace governance practices and systems that fulfill the economic and human
needs of a democratic society and foster broadly shared prosperity.
And if
you are curious about why I often think about Employment with a Human Face around
the holidays, here is my story. The very first copy of the book (so the very
first copy of any book I had written), was delivered to my home on Christmas
Eve in 2003. But no one heard the delivery person. My wife and I were up late
getting things ready for Christmas morning. At around 1 in the morning (so it
actually is Christmas by this point) a light snow is falling and for some
reason I opened our front door, and a package falls into our front entry.
Completely unexpectedly it was the very first copy of Employment with a Human
Face. I won’t go so far as to say that it was a Christmas miracle because that
would cheapen the significance of the holiday season, but it was a touching
moment, complete with a gentle snow on an otherwise still night, that I will
always remember.
Happy
Holidays, and may your 2018 be filled with efficiency, equity, and voice.
Update (May 2018): Upon further reflection, a teenage Employment with a Human Face should also explicitly demonstrate that equity and voice include identity concerns.
Update (May 2018): Upon further reflection, a teenage Employment with a Human Face should also explicitly demonstrate that equity and voice include identity concerns.
No comments:
Post a Comment